CJP Bengaluru Protest: Prakash Raj, Dhruv Rathee Seek SIR Rollback
Prakash Raj, Dhruv Rathee and CJP leaders addressed the October 8 Freedom Park protest in Bengaluru. Read their SIR demands, the Election Commission’s own enrolment directive and how the event differs from the proposed Delhi action.

AI-generated conceptual illustration by Verdvit; not a photograph of the October 8 CJP protest or its participants.
Bengaluru, 8 October 2026. Reporting checked through the 17:12 IST Hindustan Times update.
The CJP Bengaluru protest at Freedom Park brought actor Prakash Raj, YouTuber Dhruv Rathee and Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke onto the stage on Thursday, October 8. Protesters called for the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls to be withdrawn and for Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar to resign. Hindustan Times reported at 17:12 IST that people were continuing to join the gathering. No independently verified attendance count was available in the reports checked. [1][2]
The afternoon speeches sharpened the focus beyond one official’s resignation. Prakash Raj argued that replacing the CEC would not resolve the protesters’ objections to SIR. Rathee questioned the Election Commission’s transparency, while saying he had not joined the event for “regime change.” Their criticisms are attributed political statements, not findings that electoral wrongdoing has been proved. [1][2]
Key points
- CJP’s Freedom Park protest took place in Bengaluru on October 8, not October 9. Speakers and participants were reported at the venue. [1][2]
- Prakash Raj called for SIR to be scrapped; Dhruv Rathee questioned the Election Commission’s accountability. [1][2]
- Organisers presented the programme as a People’s Tribunal, with a women’s-solidarity “Chappal protest” also announced. [1][3]
- The Election Commission’s separate October 1 directive ordered a special drive to help eligible left-out and first-time voters enrol after SIR. [4]
- The proposed October 10 Delhi protest at Jantar Mantar is a separate event; Bengaluru’s gathering does not establish Delhi permission or a confirmed start time. [5][6]
What happened at the CJP Bengaluru protest?
Freedom Park was the venue for speeches, slogans and a gathering involving women, students and civil-society participants. The New Indian Express reported that Raj, Rathee and Dipke led the protest. Hindustan Times’ afternoon updates documented Rathee addressing the gathering and participants calling for SIR to be withdrawn. [1][2]
Posters included messages about names missing from voter lists and appeals to listen to affected voters. Those signs show what protesters wanted to communicate; they do not independently verify the underlying deletion cases. The distinction matters in a dispute where accounts of individual experiences sit alongside much wider political allegations. [1][2]
Police told The New Indian Express that tight security arrangements had been made at the venue. The reports checked do not establish a final crowd total or the event’s closing time. This article therefore describes what was reported during the protest, rather than presenting the entire programme as completed. [1][2]
What did Prakash Raj and Dhruv Rathee say?
Prakash Raj’s central demand was withdrawal of the revision exercise. As reported by PTI through Hindustan Times and The New Indian Express, he said the issue concerned citizens’ dignity and voting rights, not only the identity of the Chief Election Commissioner. He argued that another appointment would not satisfy the protesters if SIR continued. [1][2]
Rathee said his participation was not aimed at changing the government. He alleged a lack of transparency and accountability in the Election Commission’s handling of the revision. Dipke also criticised the commission and government and said the agitation would continue. These are the speakers’ positions; Verdvit has not independently examined evidence sufficient to establish their broader allegations. [1][2]
The stage speeches give readers a clearer account of the protest’s purpose than the earlier announcements alone: participants were pressing both an institutional demand concerning SIR and a political demand concerning Kumar’s resignation. Neither demand had become an official decision in the checked reporting. [1][2]
Why is CJP protesting against SIR?
SIR stands for Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, the lists used to establish who is registered to vote. CJP and allied groups argue that eligible people have been excluded and want the revision withdrawn, an independent inquiry and restoration of the earlier electoral-roll baseline they cite. [1][5]
The Bengaluru programme included a People’s Tribunal intended to hear people who said the revision had affected them. “Tribunal” here is the organisers’ description of the public event, not evidence that a court issued a judgment. Individual accounts require checking against electoral records and the relevant authorities’ decisions. [1][3]
One afternoon update described a participant who alleged his name had been removed without his understanding who requested the deletion. This article does not convert that reported allegation into a verified finding about his record, or extrapolate it to an unverified nationwide number. [1]
What does the Election Commission’s own record say?
An Election Commission directive dated October 1, 2026 ordered a special enrolment drive in states and Union Territories after completion of SIR. Officials were told to compare current and pre-SIR rolls, identify people left out, make house-to-house visits and facilitate Form 6 applications where the person was eligible. The directive also covered first-time and young electors. [4]
That document supplies the commission’s administrative position: enrolment continues, and eligible people missing from the rolls should receive help applying. It is not a specific response to Prakash Raj’s October 8 speech, and it does not settle every allegation made at Freedom Park. No direct, event-specific ECI reply to those afternoon remarks was verified for this article. [4]
How does Bengaluru relate to the Delhi protest at Jantar Mantar?
The Bengaluru gathering preceded CJP and student groups’ proposed October 10 Delhi action. Reports described Jantar Mantar as the intended venue and linked the call to demands concerning SIR and the CEC. [5][6]
For readers searching “CJP at Jantar Mantar” or “Delhi protest,” the two locations should not be confused. Bengaluru’s October 8 stage speeches are reported developments; the October 10 Delhi gathering remains a separate proposed event. Earlier reporting described police denying permission, while organisers said their intimation was acknowledged. An acknowledgement is not permission. [6]
Verdvit’s existing CJP Delhi protest report covers that separate permission question. No approved alternative Delhi venue or verified rally start time is supplied here.
CJP protest FAQs
Who is the present Chief Election Commissioner of India?
The Election Commission’s official serving-members page lists Gyanesh Kumar, who took charge on February 19, 2025. Protesters’ calls for his resignation do not mean he has resigned. [7]
Who was Chief Election Commissioner in 2019 and 2021?
Sunil Arora held the office throughout 2019 and until April 12, 2021. Sushil Chandra took over on April 13, 2021. A question about the CEC in 2021 therefore needs a date within that year. [8]
What is the protest at Jantar Mantar?
In this CJP context, it refers to the proposed October 10 Delhi action over electoral-roll revision and demands concerning the CEC. It is not the October 8 Bengaluru gathering at Freedom Park. [5][6]
Is an official CJP website needed to confirm these updates?
This report relies on identified newsroom reports and Election Commission documents. No official CJP website was independently verified for this article; a website or social account should not be treated as official solely because it uses the party’s name.
Sources
- Hindustan Times: Bengaluru CJP live reporting, including afternoon speeches and the 17:12 IST continuation update, October 8, 2026.
- The New Indian Express, with PTI inputs: Prakash Raj, Dhruv Rathee and Dipke at the Bengaluru protest; demands and police security statement, October 8, 2026.
- PTI via Deccan Chronicle: People’s Tribunal and women’s-solidarity Chappal protest announcement, October 8, 2026.
- Election Commission of India: Special drive in states/Union Territories after completion of SIR; directive dated October 1, 2026.
- Times of India: Bengaluru programme and the separate proposed October 10 Delhi mobilisation, October 8, 2026.
- The Pioneer: Reported police permission denial concerning the proposed October 10 Delhi protest.
- Election Commission of India: Hon’ble Commission, serving CEC record.
- Election Commission of India: Former Chief Election Commissioners, official tenure dates.
VERDVIT